Growth and the climate.

No one would find it unusual that low or negative economic growth attracts very little media investigation into any positive effect in terms of constrained carbon emission. Constrained growth is an unpopular policy option.

However, it's said that this maybe the only option to hold climate change below dangerous +2 degree C temperature. Wealthy societies are consuming carbon in a manner that pushes the planet closer to a tipping point where 40 to 70% of global species becomes extinct.

Over recent decades much of the international effort has been expended on assisting developing countries put in place strategies to adapt to climate change to mitigate effects such sea level rise, floods, droughts and extreme weather events.

Nevertheless, without major falls in emissions, these adaptation efforts may do little to stop our future being like a bad movie. As we have learned from development in health and education, it’s addressing the cause, not only short term effects, that leads to sustainable improvement. Adaptation and efficiency is not enough.

While millions of people have been lifted out of poverty, increasing carbon emissions are still driven by wealthy consumers across the globe. It’s understandable that people underestimate the individual effects of their lifestyle on the climate. But look around, think global and consider the sum of billions of individual impacts multiplied across the planet.

The millennium development goals end in 2015 and the consultation about the shape of the next global development goals is in progress now. Even mainstream economic models are evolving to include the environmental costs. The transition to a low carbon economy will be costly and disruptive but the medium term holds prospects for leaders willing to use today’s science to serve tomorrow’s world. Action can be positive.

New consumers can demand less damaging energy systems by learning from the mistakes of today’s wealthy countries.

New jobs can be provided by a functional low carbon economy.

While not planned, is the current economic slow down a short timeout before the last part of a game changing period?

Together with the developing world, wealthy countries must scale up collective effort to preserve what we can, to end this global scale crisis and build commitment across generations for a better tomorrow. Partnerships for development provide an example of new ways to work together on such collective interests.

Ask yourself, ‘’In 10 years time, What will a child think about the choices we make today?"

 

Have your say about standards in humanitarian work

A sector-wide consultation on the coherence and effectiveness of humanitarian standards has been launched by the Sphere Project, the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP) International and People In Aid.

You can participate by responding to an online survey and/or conducting a focus group discussion.

http://www.sphereproject.org/news/global-consultation-on-humanitarian-standards-hots-up/

Source: http://www.sphereproject.org

Partnerships, more effective tools or new packaging?

Global conferences consume significant resources and can appear to some to achieve little. Technology has changed the world, not always in a better way. Slow growth resulting from the financial crisis has impacted development funding potential.

Is the new partnership approach to international development cooperation a useful conception of the way forward?

What is needed for nations to think past historical national interests and reach out to the levers which open opportunity for greater international benefit?

Will developing nations be able to project themselves into a future where climate change does not threaten positive progress?

This story is unfolding before us and calls for everyone; private, public, local, global, to reflect on our potential roles and responsibilities.

International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal

"The League of Nations, created in 1927 and wound up in 1946, left a legacy which had functioned with some efficiency throughout the League's existence, namely its Administrative Tribunal. In addition to serving the League itself, the Tribunal also served the International Labour Organization, which had been in existence since 1919. One positive part of the legacy of the League was to preserve the Tribunal and transfer it, in 1946, to the ILO which became a specialized agency of the newly created United Nations Organization. The ILO, which had been established to define and protect the rights of workers, was the logical destination for the Tribunal, whose mandate was to provide guarantees that the officials employed by the institutions over which it had jurisdiction at that time, viz. the League and the ILO, would enjoy protection against arbitrary acts committed against them by their employer. By the time of its transfer to the ILO, the Tribunal had dealt with 37 cases."